Category Archives: The Right Kind of Customer Service

Free Support is Best Solution

Free Support is Best Solution

As Dan Schaeffer stared at the small font on a mind-numbingly large spreadsheet he decided that Tuesday would be a lot like Monday.  Half way across the country, Steve Penderman looked at the top message in his inbox and reached a different conclusion – Tuesday was going to stink.

Earlier in the month Dan’s software company sent his customer Steve an invoice for annual maintenance fees.  Like other software companies around the world, Dan’s sent hundreds of invoices each day which charged fees to provide ongoing support.

Steve’s team depends on the software each day.  If it breaks or is configured incorrectly, his company loses millions in lost productivity.  The note Steve saw when he gazed into his inbox was an invoice from Schaeffer.

On most days the arrival of an invoice would start a pre-determined set of processes.  Steve’s team would analyze expenses, perform a competitive analysis, and make a business decision to see if they could satisfy the needs more cost effectively elsewhere.

Today however, the invoice presented a problem because their budget, finalized weeks ago, had not included the fees.  So Steve picked up the phone.

As Steve’s name popped onto the caller ID screen Dan groaned and thought “ugh, this guy works us over for concessions all year long and then nickels and dimes us each time we send an invoice.  Looks like today won’t be like yesterday after all.”

After complaining about the high price for a few minutes, Penderman finally came to the point.  “Your product doesn’t work and is basically useless,” said Steve.  “So you need to waive the annual fees as compensation.”

Dan replied “Steve, we can’t just waive fees, we use those to support you by hiring and training the people who answer inquiries, repair defects (bugs) and make product innovations.”

Unmoved, Steve indicated that the product was so bad that they hadn’t even budgeted the fees.  “Look Schaeffer,” said Steve, “the money just isn’t there.  Unless you waive the fees we’ll be forced to look to your competition for a replacement.”

How would you handle Steve’s predicament?  What about Dan’s?

(For the past few years, I’ve tried to come up with clever posts on April Fool’s day.  On occasion the posts have been convincing enough to vex those who care deeply about customer service.  This post has many elements of an April Fool’s day post, contains a deliberately facetious title and uses fictional characters to protect the innocent and the guilty.  Unfortunately, it is also true.)

What’s the pivot point?  Are you kidding me?  Any kid who has ever operated a lemonade stand can figure this one out.  If costs exceed revenues you may quench your thirst by making lemonade from lemons, but you’re bound to go hungry.  If you try this same model in business enough times you can expect to become acquainted with the term Chapter 7.  The pivot point is that free support is no solution.  While it may help Steve in the short term, Dan’s company will suffer and as it does, the support Steve receives “for free” will get worse and worse.

For fans of irony I include these points:

  • To create an environment where decisions are based on facts and free from the appearance (real or imagined) of quid pro quo Steve’s employee ethics guidelines prevent him from accepting anything (even something as trivial as a cup of coffee) from vendors.  Steve sees no conflict in asking for free support.
  • Steve’s company is, by all accounts, very successful and profitable.  They insist that their customers pay them.

Why What You Want Doesn’t Matter

Ever get unsolicited calls from someone trying to sell you something?  I got one the other day and was reminded why they are generally unsuccessful.

The salesperson went through a brief introduction of himself and his company (they outsource technical support).  Then he mentioned some customer names to pique my interest.  (Perhaps he thought we wanted to emulate those companies?)  He left his contact information and followed up with an email to be sure I had his contact information.  All in all, it was standard fare for an outbound sales call.

Here’s why he didn’t/won’t receive a return call.

The call focused on what he wanted.  In a message that lasted sixty-two (62) seconds, he told me what I could do for him… four (4) times!  Not once did he appeal to my business needs.  Was I trying to:

  • Reduce costs?
  • Increase customer satisfaction?
  • Drive revenue higher?

I had zero incentive to pick up the phone to help because – what he wanted doesn’t matter.  To earn the return call he should have painted a clear picture of how his business, product, or service could solve my problem.

The pivot point is that we must ensure our phone calls and emails serve customers’ needs.  If our value-proposition solves our needs alone, customers have no reason to respond to our well-intentioned outreach.

What’s that Giant Sucking Sound?

During the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign Ross Perot famously referred to a “giant sucking sound” of U.S. jobs heading to Mexico when NAFTA went into effect.  If you’re not careful, that giant sucking sound could be your customer service.

Despite unparalleled interest in delivering customer service (2/3 of large North American companies according to a Temkin Group survey) the #1 obstacle to doing so is “competing priorities”.  What this says, quite simply, is that our customer service efforts are merely lip service.  If we don’t invest in our people and our service, it stands to reason that customer service will suffer.

Luminaries in other aspects of business have pronounced simple (effective?) ways to focus their efforts.  For example, when it comes to innovation, Steve Jobs insists you “Get Rid of the Crappy Stuff” and when it comes to managing your brand, listen to Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales and “Make Stuff that Doesn’t Suck.”  What mantra should customer experience professionals adopt to simplify and focus our attention?  Here’s a suggestion:

Treat Customers as You Want to be Treated

We want to deal (i.e. spend) with companies that:

  1. Are easy to do business with – Make purchases simple, buying more or exchanging items is straight-forward.  Don’t include hidden costs or fees.
  2. Trust us – I had an abominable experience at a Polo store not too long ago.  What should have been a simple exchange turned into an exercise where I had to prove the product was defective.  The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution may protect our innocence unless proven otherwise, but don’t count on this treatment at Ralph Lauren.
  3. Are fair to us – Fair is a tough notion to teach.  In customer service, fairness is about keeping consumers’ interests at heart.  Look out for corporate interests, but remember that in many cases, customer interests are the same as corporate interests.
  4. Are honest and informative – Can we count on the information we receive or is it likely to hide/skirt the truth?
  5. Responsive – Does the company value my business and do they act like it?  My time is important.

Customer service takes effort and it requires a focus we seem to have lost.  The pivot point is that we must invest in customer service and experience capabilities just as we invest in market development or product functionality.  When we fail to take those steps we miss out on the most cost-effective way to drive new growth and market share.  It may not be as simple as the Golden Rule, but it is a good first step which, once taken, can help service from sucking.

What mantra does your company use when describing its customer service?