Tag Archives: Truth

Commitment Phobia

Not long ago I returned from a trip to Brussels where we hosted a successful symposium for our customers (100% of survey respondents would recommend the event to others).  Ask anyone who has been a part of these events what makes them successful and the answer will be three (3) things:  planning, execution, and reacting to change(s).

We found ourselves in a bit of a conundrum when our vendor didn’t meet commitments they made.  In our case, they said a conference room would seat one number of participants when in fact it seated 20% fewer.  This lack of space was a problem… and we adapted successfully.

But it highlights one of the “golden rules” of customer service.  Do what you say you will do.  Meet commitments. There are 4 types of commitments one can make:

  1. No Hope of Keeping – Don’t fall into this trap.  In this arena, I’m a big fan of a “one strike and you’re out” policy.
  2. Keep – This is the standard. Meeting commitments is perfectly acceptable for customers.
  3. Keep and Exceed – This is the goal. Do better than what your customer expects, or do better than the competition’s capabilities and you’re on the way to dominating a market.
  4. Determine Later You Can’t Keep – The exception… when this happens, fess up early.  I have a friend who says “bad news doesn’t get better with time”.  He is absolutely correct.  If you find yourself in a situation where a commitment will be missed, let your customer know and apologize.  (Ideally, have a new solution or prepare a revised timeline in advance of the discussion.  That is, come with a solution, not just a problem.)  Customers may be angry, but not as angry as they’d be if you surprised them later.

Individuals fear commitment; more so when their organizations are complex and rely on many people to deliver a solution or product on time.  But commitments about your products and services are a key component of the value.  Without setting and making expectations customers seek out alternative providers who will make and keep commitments.

If your company doesn’t make commitments, or routinely misses them, you know you have a big problem whose solution will depend on whether or not the company (1) views the misses as a problem and (2) whether they are prepared to correct the problem.  If both of these cases hold, look for new work – your life will be miserable and your personal brand will be tainted by a poor company.

The pivot point (which I hope you agree is common sense) is that your company’s success depends on your ability to make and keep commitments.

Why Getting Rejected is So Great for Relationships

The software industry is faced with a challenge common to other industries; too many good ideas, and not enough time and money to implement them all.  This simple fact can hinder customer service if handled poorly.  When examining customer feature requests (either new ones or product modifications) there are two classifications: healthy and unhealthy.

Healthy

  • Implement the Customer’s Request – No mystery here, right?  Good and easy ideas reach consensus quickly.  When many customers share a need the marketplace self-validates.
  • Reject or Decline the Idea QuicklyDon’t confuse rejecting an idea with ignoring it.  Rejected ideas deserve greater consideration than implemented ideas.  Your company must provide a strong explanation regarding why an idea would be rejected. This rejection is a conversation with your customer.  “I heard you, I considered the idea, yet we will be pursuing another direction.”  Notice that healthy does not mean, without pain.  Customers whose ideas are declined will not be happy yet those same customers will respect your honesty.  That honesty breeds confidence which in turn enables open dialogue which yields future business opportunities.

Unhealthy

  • Provide Lip Service – Letting ideas meander aimlessly along the river Styx to suffer purgatory in an under review status is a coward’s way to work with customers and it does nothing to forge a lasting relationship.
  • Ignore the Request – When ideas are never considered companies send a strong, though silent, message: “your needs don’t matter.” One of the golden rules of service is listening to customers.  If companies fail this most basic of tests they should expect to lose customers.

The pivot point is that when fulfilling customers’ requests, whether for a type of service, a new product, or a product modification, rejecting customers’ requests (with tact) is an acceptable alternative.  Rejection hurts, but so does being strung along.  And no one wants that in their relationship.

When Walking from Deals is a Good Thing

Read a good article today on the HBR blog by Clif Reichard.  Can You Sell Without Lying? He approached customer service from another angle – the beginning of the relationship with a customer – sales.  Given some of the comments, he must have hit a nerve in a touchy subject – integrity.  The great salespeople recognize that:

  • Their efforts are a solution to a customer problem,
  • Real value must be created from the transaction,
  • A single sale of questionable integrity may preclude much more lucrative opportunities later,
  • Matching customer needs with product/service capabilities is their primary function, and
  • Sometimes, walking away from a bad deal is a good thing.

The pivot point is that each part of an organization “owns” honesty. If a link in the integrity chain is broken, we all lose.  Customers lose because their needs aren’t met.  Sales loses because their reputation as a business function is tarnished.  The whole organization loses because they spend valuable time trying to recover from an avoidable situation.